8
Benign Proliferative Reactions, Intraepithelial Neoplasia, and Invasive cancer of the Uterine cervix
127. Van der Graaf Y, Vooijs GP, Gaillard HLJ,
et al. Screening errors in cervical cytologic
screening.
Acta Cytol
1987;31:434-438.
128. Vooijs GP, van Aspert-van Erp AJM, van
't Hof-Grootenboer AE, et al. Parameters
of quality control in cervical cytodiagno-
sis. In: Wied GL, Rosenthal DL, Somrak
T, et al. (eds)
Compendium on Quality
Assurance, Proficiency testing and Workload
Limitations in Clinical Cytology.
Chicago:
Tutorials of Cytology, 1995: 95-108.
129. Vooijs GP, Casparie van Velsen JAGM,
Peters FATM, et al. National registry of
cervical cytologic diagnoses in the Neth-
erlands.
Acta Cytol
1989;33:825-830.
130. van Niekerk WA. Cervical cytologi-
cal abnormalities caused by folic acid
deficiency.
Acta Cytol
1966;10:67-73.
131. Wied GL, Messina AM, Rosenthal E.
Comparative quantitative DNA-meas-
urements of Feulgen-stained cervical
epithelial cells.
Acta Cytol
1966;10:31-37.
132. Wilbanks GD, Richart RM, Terner JY.
DNA contents of cervical intraepithelial
neoplasia studied by two wavelength
Feulgen cytophotometry.
Am J Obstet
Gynecol
1967;98:792-799.
133. Fu YS, Reagan JW, Richart RM. Definition of
precursors.
Gynecol Oncol
1981;12:220-231.
134. Jakobsen A, Baek Kristensen P, Kvist
Poulsen H. Flow cytometric classifica-
tion of biopsy specimens from cervical
intra-epithelial neoplasia.
Cytometry
1983;4:166-169.
135. Atkin NB. Prognostic value of cyto-
genetic studies of tumors of the female
genital tract. In: Koss LG, Coleman DC
(eds)
Advances in Clinical Cytology
, vol 2.
New York: Masson, 1984: 103-121.
136. Atkin NB, Kay R. Prognostic significance
of modal DNA value and other factors
in malignant tumours, based on 1465
cases.
Br J Cancer
1979;40:210-221.
137. Nasiell K, Auer G, Nasiell M, et al.
Retrospective DNA analyses in cervical
dysplasia as related to neoplastic pro-
gression or regression.
Anal Quant Cytol
1979;1:103-106.
138. Hanselaar AGJM, Vooijs GP, Mayall BH,
et al. DNA changes in progressive cervi-
cal intraepithelial neoplasia.
Anal Cell
Pathol
1992;4:315-324.
139. Hanselaar AGJM, Vooijs GP, Oud PS,
et al. DNA ploidy patterns in cervical
epithelial neoplasia grade III, with and
without synchronous invasive squa-
mous cell carcinoma: Measurements in
nuclei isolated from paraffin embedded
tissue.
Cancer
1988;62:2537-2545.
140. Patten SF, Reagan JW, Obenauf M, et al.
Post-irridation dysplasia of the uterine
cervix and vagina. An analytical study of
cells.
Cancer
1963;16:173-182.
141. Broders AC. Carcinoma in situ contrast-
ing with benign penetrating epithelium.
JAMA
1932;99:1670-1674.
142. Reagan JW, Seideman IL, Saracusa
Y. The cellular morphology of carci-
noma in situ and dysplasia or atypical
hyperplasia of the uterine cervix.
Cancer
1953;6:224-235.
143. Christopherson WM, Parker JE. Carci-
noma in situ. In: Gray LA (ed.)
Dyspla-
sia, Carcinoma in Situ and Micro-Invasive
Carcinoma of the Cervix Uteri
. Spring-
field, IL: Charles C Thomas, 1964.
144. Sullivan JJ. Symposium on probable or
possible malignant cervical lesions: Carci-
noma in situ.
Acta Cytol
1962;6:183-184.
145. Van der Graaf Y, Zielhuis GA, Vooijs GP.
Cervical screening revisited.
Acta Cytol
1990;34:366-372.
146. Reagan JW, Hicks DJ. A study of in situ
and squamous cell cancer of the uterine
cervix.
Cancer
1953;6:1200-1214.
147. Green GH, Donovan JW. The natural
history of cervical carcinoma in situ.
J Obstet Gynaecol Br Comonw
1970;77:1-9.
148. Hall JE, Walton L. Dysplasia of the cervix.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
1968;100:662-671.
149. Kinlen LJ, Spriggs Al. Women with posi-
tive cervical smears but without surgical
intervention. A follow-up study.
Lancet
1978;2:463-465.
150. Fawdry RD. Carcinoma in situ of the
cervix: Is post-hysterectomy cytology
worthwhile?
Br J Obstet Gynecol
1984;91:67-72.
151. Vooijs GP. Endocervical brush device.
Lancet
1989;1:784.
152. Laverty CR, Farnsworth A, Thurloe J,
et al. The reliability of a cytological
prediction of cervical adenocarcinoma
in situ.
Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol
1988;
28:307-312.
153. Keyhani-Rofagha S, Brewer J, Prokorym
P. Comparative cytologic findings of
in situ and invasive adenocarcinoma
of the uterine cervix.
Diagn Cytopathol
1995;12:120-125.
154. Jackson SR, Hollingworth TA, Anderson
MC, et al. Glandular lesions of the
cervix—cytological and histological cor-
relation.
Cytopathology
1996;7:10-16.
155. Lee KR, Minter LJ, Granter SR. Papani-
colaou smear sensitivity for adenocarci-
noma in situ of the cervix. A study of 34
cases.
Am J Clin Pathol
1997;107:30-35.
156. Kurian K, al-Nafussi A. Relation of
cervical glandular intraepithelial neo-
plasia to microinvasive and invasive
adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix:
a study of 121 cases.
J Clin Pathol
1999; 112-117.
157. Gornall RJ, Singh N, Noble W, et al.
Glandular abnormalities on cervical
smear: a study to compare the accuracy
of cytological diagnosis with underly-
ing pathology.
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol
2000;21(1):49-52.
158. Krane JF, Granter SR, Trask CE, et al.
Papanicolaou smear sensitivity for
the detection of adenocarcinoma of
the cervix: a study of 49 cases.
Cancer
2001;931:8-15.
159. Mathers ME, Johnson SJ, Wadehra V.
How predictive is a cervical smear sug-
gesting glandular neoplasia.
Cytopathol-
ogy
2001;12(Supp.1):1-7.
160. Erzen M, Mozina A, Bertole J, et al. Fac-
tors predicting disease outcome in early
stage adenocarcinoma of the uterine
cervix.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
2002;101:185-191.
161. Schoolland M, Allpress S, Sterrett GF.
Adenocarcinoma of the cervix.
Cancer
2002;96:5-13.
162. Qizilbash AH. In-situ and microinvasive
adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix: a
clinical, cytologic and histologic study
of 14 cases.
Am J Clin Pathol
1975;64:
155-170.
163. Christopherson WM, Nealon N, Gray
LA. Noninvasive precursor lesions of
adenocarcinoma and mixed adeno-
squamous carcinoma of the cervix uteri.
Cancer
1979;44:975-983.
164. Mayer RC, Norris HJ. Coexistence of cer-
vical intraepithelial neoplasia with pri-
mary adenocarcinoma of the endocervix.
Obstet Gynecol
1980;56:361-364.
165. Gloor E, Ruzicka J. Morphology of
adenocarcinoma in situ of the uterine
cervix: A study of 14 cases.
Cancer
1984;49:294-302.
166. Choo YC, Naylor B. Coexistent squa-
mous cell carcinoma and adenocar-
cinoma of the uterine cervix.
Gynecol
Oncol
1984;17:168-174.
167. Jaworski RC, Pacey NF, Greenberg ML,
et al. The histologic diagnosis of adeno-
carcinoma in situ and related lesions of
the cervix uteri.
Cancer
1987;15:1171-1181.
168. Piura B, Dgani R, Yanai-Inbar I, et al.
Adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix:
a study of 37 cases.
J Surg Oncol
1996;61:249-255.
169. Tay EH, Yew WS, Ho TH. Management
of adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS) of
the uterine cervix-a clinical dilemma.
Singapore Med J
1999;40:36-39.
170. van Aspert-van Erp AJ, Smedts FM,
Vooijs GP. Severe cervical glandular
cell lesions and severe cervical com-
bined lesions: Predictive value of the
Papanicolaou smear.
Cancer Cytopathol
2004;102:210-217.
171. van Aspert-van Erp AJM, van 't Hof-
Grootenboer AE, Brugal G, et al.
Endocervical columnar cell intraepithe-
lial neoplasia (ECCIN). 1. Discriminat-
ing cytomorphologic criteria.
Acta Cytol
1995;39:1199-1215.
172. van Aspert-van Erp AJM, van't Hof-
Grootenboer AE, Brugal G, et al.
Endocervical columnar cell intraepithe-
lial neoplasia (ECCIN). II. Grades of
expression of cytomorphologic criteria.
Acta Cytol
1995;39:1216-1232.
173. van Aspert-van Erp AJM, van't Hof-
Grootenboer AE, Brugal G, et al. Endocervi-
cal columnar cell intraepithelial neoplasia
(ECCIN) III. Interobserver variability in
feature use.
Anal Cell Path
1996;10:115-135.
174. van Aspert-van Erp AJM, van 't Hof-
Grootenboer AE, Brugal G, et al.
Individual use of cytomorphologic
characteristics in the diagnosis of
endocervical columnar cell abnormali-
ties: selection of preferred features with
help of the 'NAVIGATOR' microscope.
Anal Cell Path
1996;11:73-95.
175. van Aspert-van Erp AJM, van 't Hof-
Grootenboer AE, Brugal G, et al.
Identifying cytologic characteristics
and grading endocervical columnar
cell abnormalities—a study aided by
high-definition television.
Acta Cytol
1997;41:1659-1670.
176. van Aspert-van Erp AJ, Smedts FM, Vooijs
GP. Severe cervical glandular cell lesions and
severe cervical combined lesions: a reevalua-
tion of cytologic (and histologic) specimens.
Cancer Cytopathol
2004; 102:218-227.
177.
Ireland D, Cble S, KellyP. Mucin production in
cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and stage 1b
carcinoma ofthe cervix with pelvic lymph node
metastases.
Br J Obstet Gynaecol
1987;94:467-472.
209
previous page 210 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online next page 212 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online Home Toggle text on/off