8
Benign Proliferative Reactions, Intraepithelial Neoplasia, and Invasive cancer of the Uterine cervix
230. Whittaker JR, Samy AMJ, Sunter JP, et al.
Cytokeratin expression in cervical epi-
thelium: An immunohistological study
of normal, wart virus-infected and neo-
plastic tissue.
Histopathology
1989;14:
151-160.
231. Ramaekers FCS, Huysmans A, Moesker
O, et al. Monoclonal antibodies in
keratin filaments specific for glandular
epithelia and their tumors; use in surgical
pathology.
Lab Invest
1983;49:353-361.
232. Ramaekers F, Huysmans A, Schaart G,
et al. Tissue distribution of keratin 7 as
monitored by a monoclonal antibody.
Exp Cell Res
1987;170:235-249.
233. Moll R, Levy R, Czernobilsky B, et al.
Cytokeratins of normal epithelia and
some neoplasm of the female genital
tract.
Lab Invest
1983;49:599-609.
234. Smedts F, Ramaekers FCS, Troyanowsky
S, et al. Basal-cell keratins in cervical
reserve cells and a comparison to their
expression in cervical intraepithelial neo-
plasia.
Am J Pathol
1992;140:601-612.
235. Smedts F, Ramaekers FCS, Vooijs GP.
The dynamics of keratin expression in
malignant transformation of cervical
epithelium. A review.
Obstet Gynecol
1993;82:465-474.
236. Puts JJG, Moesker O, Kenemans P, et al.
Expression of cytokeratins in early neoplas-
tic epithelial lesions of the uterine cervix.
Int J Gynaecol Pathol
1985;4:300-313.
237. Smedts FMM, Ramaekers FCS, Leube RE,
et al. Expression of keratins 1, 6, 15, 16
and 20 in normal cervical epithelium,
squamous metaplasia, cervical intraepi-
thelial neoplasia and in cervical carci-
noma.
Am J Pathol
1993;142:403-412.
238. Smedts F, Ramaekers FCS, Robben H,
et al: Changing patterns of keratin
expression during progression of cervi-
cal intraepithelial neoplasia.
Am J Pathol
1990;136:657-668.
239. Munger K. The molecular biology of
cervical cancer.
J Cell Biochem Suppl
1995;23:55-60.
240. Kiyono T, Foster SA, Koop JI, et al. Both
Rb/p16INK4a inactivation and telom-
erase activity are required to immor-
talize human epithelial cells.
Nature
1998;396(6706):84-88.
241. Gattoretti G, Becker MHG, Key G, et al.
Monoclonal antibodies against recom-
binant parts of the Ki-67 antigen (MIB1
and MIB3) detect proliferating cells in
microwave-processed formalin-fixed
paraffin sections.
J Pathol
1992;168:357-
363.
242. Mittal K, Mesia A, Demopoulos RI.
Mib1 expression is useful in distin-
guishing dysplasia from atrophy in
elderly women.
Int J Gynecol Pathol
1999;18:122-124.
243. Bulten J, van der Laak JA, Gemmink
JH, et al. Decreased expression of
Ki-67 in atrophic cervical epithelium
of post-menopausal women.
J Pathol
2000;190:545-553.
244. Bulten J, de Wilde PC, Boonstra H, et al.
Proliferation in "atypical" atrophic Pap
smears.
Gynecol Oncol
2000;79:225-229.
245. Dunton CJ, van Hoeven KH, Kovat-
ich AJ, et al. Ki-67 antigen staining
as an adjunct to identifying cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia.
Gynecol Oncol
1997;64:451-455.
246. Sahebali S, Depuydt CE, Segers K,
et al. Ki-67 immunocytochemistry in
liquid based cervical cytology: useful
as an adjunctive tool?
J Clin Pathol
2003;56:681-686.
247. von Knebel Doeberitz M. New markers
for cervical dysplasia to visualise the
genomic chaos created by aberrant
oncogenic papilloma virus infection.
Eur J Cancer
2002;38:2229-2242.
248. Bibbo M, Klump WJ, DeCecco J, et al.
Procedure for immunocytochemical
detection of P16INK4a antigen in thin-
layer, liquid-based specimens.
Acta Cytol
2002;46:25-29.
249. Bibbo M, DeCecco J, Kovatich AJ.
P16INK4a as an adjunct test in liquid-
based cytology.
Anal Quant Cytol Histol
2003;25:8-11.
250. Nieh S, Chen SF, Chu TY, et al. Expres-
sion of p16INK4a in Papanicolaou
smears containing atypical squamous
cells of undetermined significance
from the uterine cervix.
Gynecol Oncol
2003;91:201-208.
251. Sahebali S, Depuydt CE, Boulet GA, et
al. Immunocytochemistry in liquid-
based cervical cytology: analysis of
clinical use following a cross-sectional
study.
Int J Cancer
2006;118:1254-1260.
252. Riethdorf L, Riehtdorf S, Lee KR, et al.
Human papillomaviruses, expression of
p16, and early endocervical glandular neo-
plasia.
Human Pathol
2002;33:899-904.
253. Geirsson G. Organization of screening
in technically advanced countries: Ire-
land. In: Hakama M, Miller AB, Day NE,
(eds)
Screening for Cancer of the Uterine
Cervix.
Lyon: International Agency for
Research on Cancer, 1986: 239-250.
254. Gusberg SB. Detection and pre-
vention of uterine cancer.
Cancer
1988;62(Suppl):1784-1786.
255. Hakama M. Trends in the incidence of
cervical cancer in the Nordic countries.
In: Magnus K (ed.)
Trends in Cancer Inci-
dence, Causes and Practical Implications
.
Washington, DC: Hemisphere, 1988:
279-292.
256. Miller AB. Evaluation of the impact of
screening for cancer of the cervix. In:
Hakama M, Miller AB, Day NE (eds)
Screening for Cancer of the Uterine Cervix
.
Lyon: International Agency for Research
on Cancer, 1986: 149-160.
257. Koss LG. Replies to questions on quality
assurance measures in cytopathology.
Acta Cytol
1988;32:923-924.
258. Vooijs GP, Smedts F, van 't Hof
Grootenboer AE, et al. The accuracy of
cytologic diagnosis: Light microscopic
and cytometric criteria. In: Wied GL,
Bartels PH, Rosenthal DL (eds)
Compen-
dium on the Computerized Cytology and
Histology Laboratory
. Chicago: Tutorials
of Cytology, 1994: 34-42.
259. Astbury K, Martin CM, Ring M,
et al. Future molecular aspects of
cervical cytology.
Curr Diagn Pathol
2006;12:104-113.
260. Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, et
al. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in
screening for and follow-up of cervical
cytologic abnormalities: a systematic
review.
Ann Intern Med
2000;132:810-819.
261.
IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention,
vol. 10: Cervical Cancer Screening.
Lyon:
IARC, 2005: 70-73.
262. Klinkhamer PJJM, Meerding WJ, Rosier
PFWM, et al. Liquid-based cervical
cytology: a review of the literature with
methods of evidence-based medicine.
Cancer Cytopathol
2003;99:263-271.
263. Davey E, Barratt A, Irwig L. Effect of
study design and quality on unsatisfac-
tory rates, cytological classifications,
and accuracy in liquid-based versus con-
ventional cervical cytology: a systematic
review.
Lancet
2006;367:122-132.
264. Day NE. Estimating the sensitivity of a
screening test.
J Epidemiol Community
Health
1985;39:364-366.
265. Berkowitz RS, Ehrmann RL, Lavizzo-
Mourey R, et al: Invasive cervical carci-
noma in young women.
Gynecol Oncol
1979;8:311-316.
266. Coppleson LW, Brown B. Estimation
of the screening error rate from the
observed detection rates in repeated
cervical cytology.
Am J Obstet Gynecol
1974;119:953-958.
267. Creasman WT, Rutledge F. Carcinoma
in situ of the cervix. An analysis of 861
patients.
Obstet Gynecol
1972;39:373-380.
268. Richart RM, Vaillant HW. Influence of
cell collection techniques upon cyto-
logical diagnosis.
Cancer
1965;18:1474-
1478.
269. Cecchini S, Palli D, Casini A. Cervi-
cal intraepithelial neoplasia III. An
estimate of screening error rates and
optimal screening interval.
Acta Cytol
1985;29:329-333.
270. Klinkhamer PJJM, Vooijs GP, de Haan
AFJ. Intraobserver and interobserver
variability in the diagnosis of epithelial
abnormalities in cervical smears.
Acta
Cytol
1988;32:794-800.
271. Vooijs GP, van Aspert-van Erp AJM,
van 't Hof-Grootenboer AE, et al.
Intra- and interobserver variability. In:
Wied GL, Rosenthal DL, Somrak T (eds)
Compendium on Quality Assurance, Profi-
ciency Testing and Workload Limitations in
Clinical Cytology
. Chicago: Tutorials of
Cytology, 1995: 15-27.
272. Klinkhamer PJJM, Vooijs GP. de Haan
AFJ: Intraobserver and interobserver vari-
ability in the quality assessment of cervi-
cal smears.
Acta Cytol
1989;33:215-218.
273. Evans DMD, Shelley G, Cleary B,
et al. Observer variation and quality
control of cytodiagnosis.
J Clin Pathol
1974;27:945-950.
274. Kern WH, Zivolich MR. The accuracy and
consistency of the cytologic classifica-
tion of squamous lesions of the uterine
cervix.
Acta Cytol
1977;21:519-523.
275. Vooijs GP. Biometrically designed
spatula for cervical scraping.
Acta Cytol
1987;31:82.
276. Wied GL, Bonfiglio TA, Cardin V, et al.
Replies to questions on quality assur-
ance measures in cytopathology.
Acta
Cytol
1988;32:913-939.
277. Gay JD, Donaldson LD, Goellner JP.
False-negative results in cervical
cytologic studies.
Acta Cytol
1985;29:
1043-1046.
211
previous page 212 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online next page 214 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online Home Toggle text on/off