PART TWO
Diagnostic Cytology
278. Kern WH. Replies to questions on qual-
ity assurance measures in cytopathol-
ogy.
Acta Cytol
1988;32:922-923.
279. Sedlis A, Walters AT, Balin H, et al. Eval-
uation of two simultaneously obtained
cervical smears: A comparison study.
Acta Cytol
1974;18:291-296.
280. Wood RJ, Hicklin MD. Rescreening as a
quality control procedure in cytopathol-
ogy.
Acta Cytol
1977;21:240-246.
281. Koss LG, Hicklin MD. Standards of
adequacy of cytologic screening of the
female genital tract. Conclusions of
study group on cytology.
Obstet Gynecol
1974;43:792-793.
282. Vooijs GP, van der Graaf Y, Elias AG.
Cellular composition of cervical smears
in relation to the day of the menstrual
cycle and the method of contraception.
Acta Cytol
1987;31:417-426.
283. Vooijs GP, Van der Graaf Y, Vooijs MA.
The presence of endometrial cells in
cervical smears in relation to the day of
the menstrual cycle and the method of
contraception.
Acta Cytol
1987;31:
427-433.
284. Vooijs GP. Significance of cellular com-
position of smears for the reliability of
cytological diagnoses. In: Goertler K,
Feichter GE, Wittel S (eds)
New Frontiers
in Cytology. Modern Aspects of Research
and Practice.
New York: Springer-Verlag,
1988: 412-420.
212
previous page 213 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online next page 215 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online Home Toggle text on/off