PART ONE
General Cytology
52. Vooijs GP. Quality assurance and control
in cytology: Literature search. In: Wied GL,
Keebler CM, Rosenthal DL, et al. (eds)
Compendium on Quality Assurance, Pro-
ficiency Testing and Workload Limitations
in Clinical Cytology.
Chicago: Tutorials of
Cytology, 1995: 390-399.
53. Gilbert FE, Hicklin MD, Inhorn SL, et al.
Conclusions of a study group on stand-
ards of adequacy of cytologic examina-
tions of the female genital tract.
Acta Cytol
1973;17:559-561.
54. Solomon D, Henry M: Specimen
adequacy. In: Wied GL, Keebler CM,
Rosenthal DL, et al. (eds)
Compendium on
Quality Assurance, Proficiency Testing and
Workload Limitations in Clinical Cytology.
Chicago: Tutorials of Cytology, 1995:
90-94.
55. Vooijs GP, Elias A, van der Graaf Y, et al.
The influence of sample takers on the
cellular composition of cervical smears.
Acta Cytol
1986;30:251-257.
56. Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, et al.
The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology
for reporting results of cervical cytology.
JAMA
2001;287:2114-2119.
57. Rules and Regulations—Cytology—
Federal Register February 28 1992, 57:40.
58.
Rules and Regulations
Cytology—Federal
Register.
January 24 2003, 68:16.
59. Faraker CA. Partial rescreening of all
negative smears. An improved method
of quality assurance in laboratories
undertaking cervical screening.
Cytopathology
1993;4:47-50.
60. Baker A, Melcher DH. Rapid cervical
cytology screening.
Cytopathology
2001;2:299-301.
61. Arbyn M, Schenck U. Detection of false
negative Pap smears by rapid reviewing. a
metaanalysis.
Acta Cytol
2000;44(6):949-
957.
62. Collaco LM, Noronha LD, Bleggi-Torres
LF, et al. Quality control in cervical
cancer screening: Brazilian Experience.
Acta Cytol
2005;49:694-696.
63. Specifications of automated cytodiagnos-
tic systems, proposed by the International
Academy of Cytology.
Analyt Quant Cytol
1984;6:146.
Wied GL, Bartels PH, Rosenthal DL, et
75.
al. (eds)
Compendium on the Computerized
Cytology and Histology Laboratory.
Chicago:
Tutorials of Cytology (International Acad-
emy of Cytology), 1994.
Wied GL, Keebler CM, Rosenthal DL, et
al (eds)
Compendium on Quality Assurance,
76.
Proficiency Testing and Workload Limitations
in Clinical Cytology.
Chicago: Tutorials of
Cytology, 1995.
Grohs HK, Husain OAN (eds).
Automated
Cervical Cancer Screening.
New York:
77.
Igaku-Shoin, 1994.
Hutchinson ML, Zahniser DJ. Cervical
cytology automation. In: Marchevsky
AM, Bartels PH (eds)
Image Analysis.
New
78.
York: Raven, 1994; 309-334.
Wilbur DC, Prey MU, Miller WM, et al.
The AutoPap system for primary
screening in cervical cytology: Comparing
the results of a prospective, intended-use
study with routine manual practice.
Acta
Cytol
1998;42:214-220.
79.
Bibbo M, Hawthorne C. Does use of
the AutoPap assisted primary screener
improve cytologic diagnosis?
Acta Cytol
1999;43:23-26.
Bibbo M, Hawthorne C. Performance of
the AutoPap primary screening system at
Jefferson University Hospital.
Acta Cytol
1999;43:27-29.
80.
Marshall CJ, Rowe L, Bentz JS. Improved
quality-control detection of false-negative
Pap smears using the AutoPap 300 QC
system.
Diagn Cytopathol
1999;20:
170-174.
Renshaw AA, Lezon KM, Wilbur DC.
The human false-negative rate of
81.
rescreening Pap tests. Measured in a
two-arm prospective clinical trial.
Cancer
2001;93(2):106-110.
Dawson AE. Can we change the way
we screen? The ThinPrep Imaging
82.
System®: Clinical trial data and
early experience.
Cancer Cytopathol
2004;102:340-344.
Biscotti CV, Dawson AE, Dziura B,
et al. Assisted primary screening
using the automated ThinPrep
Imaging System.
Am J Clin Pathol
2005;123(2):281-287.
64.
65.
66.
67.
68.
69.
70.
71.
72.
73.
74.
Dziura B, Quinn S, Richard K.
Performance on an imaging system vs.
manual screening in the detection of
squamous intraepithelial lesions of the
uterine cervix.
Acta Cytol
2006;50:
309-311.
Bolger N, Heffron C, Regan I, et al.
Implementations and evaluation of a
new automated interactive image analysis
system for cervical cytology.
Acta Cytol
2006;50:483-491.
Collins DN, Kaufman W, Clinton W.
Quality evaluation of cytology
laboratories in New York State.
Acta Cytol
1974;18:404-413.
Lunz ME. Validity and reliability of com-
petency testing. In: Wied GL, Keebler CM,
Rosenthal DL, et al. (eds)
Compendium on
Quality Assurance, Proficiency Testing and
Workload Limitations in Clinical Cytology.
Chicago: Tutorials of Cytology, 1995:
241-243.
Plott AE. Cytology proficiency testing
research and development at the Centers
for Disease Control, 1967-1992. In:
Wied GL, Keebler CM, Rosenthal DL, et
al. (eds)
Compendium on Quality Assur-
ance, Proficiency Testing and Workload
Limitations in Clinical Cytology.
Chicago:
Tutorials of Cytology, 1995: 244-245.
Rosenthal DL. Criteria and standards for
cytology proficiency testing. In: Wied
GL, Keebler CM, Rosenthal DL, et al.
(eds)
Compendium on Quality Assurance,
Proficiency Testing and Workload Limitations
in Clinical Cytology.
Chicago: Tutorials of
Cytology, 1995: 238-240.
Scientific issues related to the cytology
proficiencytesting regulations.
Cytopathology Education and
Technology Consortium.
Acta Cytol
2006;50:191-197.
Bonfiglio TA, Nayar R, Abdul-Karim FW.
ASCP sets high standards for regulatory
gynecologic cytology proficiency testing.
Lab Med
2006;37:733-735.
64
previous page 68 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online next page 70 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online Home Toggle text on/off