PART TWO
Diagnostic Cytology
biopsy and fine-needle aspiration cytol-
ogy.
Radiology
1991;181:745-750.
53.
Hatada T, Ishii H, Ichii S, et al. Diagnos-
tic value of ultrasound-guided fine
needle aspiration biopsy, core-needle
biopsy and evaluation of combined use
in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
J Am
Coll Surg
2000;190:299-303.
54.
Liao J, Davey DD, Warren G, et al. Ultra-
sound-guided fine needle aspiration
biopsy remains a valid approach in the
evaluation of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Diagn Cytopathol
2004;30:325-331.
55.
Masood S, Loya A, Khalbuss W. Is core
needle biopsy superior to fine needle
aspiration biopsy in the diagnosis
of papillary breast lesions?
Diagn
Cytopathol
2003;28:329-334.
56.
Saarela AO, Kiviniemi HO, Rissanen TJ,
et al. Nonpalpable breast lesions: patho-
logic correlation of ultrasonographically
guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
J
Ultrasound Med
1996;15:549-553.
57.
Shabot M, Goldberg IM, Schick P, et al.
Aspiration cytology is superior to Tru-
Cut needle biopsy in establishing the
diagnosis of clinically suspicious breast
masses.
Ann Surg
1982;196:122-126.
58.
Caruso ML, Gabrieli G, Marzullo G,
et al. Core biopsy as alternative to fine
needle aspiration biopsy in diagnosis of
breast tumors.
Oncologist
1998;3:45-49.
59.
Ibrahim AE, Bateman AC, Theaker JM, et
al. The role and histological classification
of needle core biopsy in comparison with
fine needle aspiration cytology in the pre-
operative assessment of impalpable breast
lesions.
Am J Clin Pathol
2001;54:121-125.
60.
Leifland K, Lagerstedt U, Svane G.
Comparison of needle biopsy in 522
non-palpable breast lesions.
Acta Radiol
2003;44:387-391.
61.
Liberman L. Contennial disserta-
tion. Percutaneous imaging-guided
core breast biopsy: state of the art
at the millennium.
Am J Roentgenol
2000;174:1191-1199.
62.
Liberman L, LaTrenta LR, Dershaw DD, et
al. Impact of core biopsy on the surgical
management of impalpable breast can-
cer.
Am J Roentgenol
1997;168:495-499.
63.
Oyama T, Koibuchi Y, McKeen G. Core
needle biopsy (CNB) as a diagnostic
method for breast lesions: comparison
with fine needle aspiration cytology
(FNA).
Breast Cancer
2004;11:339-342.
64.
Pisano ED, Fajardo LL, Tsimikas J, et
al. Rate of insufficient samples for fine-
needle aspiration for nonpalpable breast
lesions in a multicenter clinical trial.
Can-
cer (Cancer Cytopathol)
1998;82:679-688.
65.
Cobb CJ, Raza AS. Obituary: alas poor
FNA of breast: we knew thee well!
Diagn Cytopathol
2005;32:1-4.
66.
Martelli G, Pilotti S, de Yoldi GC, et al.
Diagnostic efficacy of physical examina-
tion, mammography, fine needle aspira-
tion cytology (triple-test) in solid breast
lumps: an analysis of 1708 consecutive
cases.
Tumori
1990;76:476-479.
67.
Lau SK, McKee GT, Weir MM, et al. The
negative predictive value of breast fine
needle aspiration biopsy: the Massachu-
setts General Hospital experience.
Breast
J
2004;10:487-491.
68.
Xie HB, Salhadar A, Haara A, et al. How
stereotactic core-needle biopsy affected
breast fine needle aspiration utilization:
an 11-year institutional review.
Diagn
Cytopathol
2004;31:106-110.
69.
Ku NNK, Mela NJ, Fiorica JV, et al. Role
of fine needle aspiration cytology after
lumpectomy.
Acta Cytol
1994;38:927-932.
70.
Hoda SA, Rosen PP. Practical consid-
erations in the pathologic diagnosis of
needle core biopsies of breast.
Am J Clin
Pathol
2002;118:101-108.
71.
Jacobs TW, Connolly JL, Schnitt SJ. Non-
malignant lesions in breast core needle
biopsies: to excise or not to excise?
Am J
Surg Pathol
2002;26:1095-1110.
72.
Albert US, Duda V, Hadji P. Imprint
cytology of core needle biopsy
specimens of breast lesions: a rapid
approach to detecting malignancies,
with comparison of cytologic and his-
topathologic analyses of 173 cases.
Acta
Cytol
2000;44:57-62.
73.
Farshid G, Pieterse S. Core imprint
cytology of screen-detected breast
lesions is predictive of the histologic
results.
Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol)
2005;108:150-156.
74.
Norton LW, Davis JR, Wiens JL, et al. Accu-
racy of aspiration cytology in detecting
breast cancer.
Surgery
1984;96:806-814.
75.
Silverman JF. Diagnostic accuracy,
cost-effectiveness, and triage role of
fine-needle aspiration biopsy in the
diagnosis of palpable breast lesions.
Breast J
1995;1:3-8.
76.
Silverman JF, Finley JL, O'Brien K, et
al. Diagnostic accuracy and role of
immediate interpretation of fine needle
aspiration biopsy specimens from vari-
ous sites.
Acta Cytol
1989;33:791-796.
77.
Evans WP. Fine-needle aspiration
cytology and core biopsy of nonpal-
pable breast lesions.
Curr Opin Radiol
1992;4:130-138.
78.
Hatada T, Ishii H, Ichii S, et al. Diagnos-
tic value of ultrasound-guided fine-
needle aspiration biopsy, core needle
biopsy and evaluation of combined use
in the diagnosis of breast lesions.
J Am
Coll Surg
2000;190:299-303.
79.
Jackson VP, Reynolds HE. Stereotaxic nee-
dle-core biopsy and fine-needle aspiration
cytologic evaluation of nonpalpable breast
lesions.
Radiology
1991;181:633-634.
80.
Zarbo RJ, Howanitz PJ, Bachner P.
Inter-institutional comparison of
performance in breast fine-needle
aspiration cytology.
Arch Pathol Lab Med
1991;115:743-750.
81.
Kline TS.
Handbook of Fine Needle Aspira-
tion Biopsy Cytology.
St. Louis:Mosby,
1988.
82.
Layfield LJ, Glasgow BJ, Cramer H.
Fine-needle aspiration in the manage-
ment of breast masses.
Pathol Annu
1989;24:23-62.
83.
Zajdela A, Zillhardt P, Voillemot N.
Cytological diagnosis by fine needle
sampling without aspiration.
Cancer
1987;59:1201-1205.
84.
Boerner S, Sneige N. Specimen adequacy
and false-negative diagnosis rate in fine-nee-
dle aspirates of palpable breast masses.
Can-
cer (Cancer Cytopathol)
1998;84:344-348.
85.
Layfield LJ, Dodd LG. Cytologically low
grade malignancies: an important inter-
pretative pitfall responsible for false
negative diagnoses in fine needle aspira-
tion of the breast.
Diagn Cytopathol
1996;15:250-259.
86.
Lerma E, Fumanal V, Carreras A, et al.
Undetected invasive lobular carcinoma of
the breast: review of false-negative smears.
Diagn Cytopathol
2000;23:303-307.
87.
Al-Kaisi N. The spectrum of the "gray
zone" in breast cytology. A review of
186 cases of atypical and suspicious
cytology.
Acta Cytol
1994;38:898-908.
88.
Maygarden SJ, Novotny DB, Johnson
DE, et al. Fine-needle aspiration cytol-
ogy of suture granulomas of the breast:
a potential pitfall in the cytologic diag-
nosis of recurrent breast cancer.
Diagn
Cytopathol
1994;10:175-179.
89.
Mori I, Han B, Wang X, et al. Masto-
pathic fibroadenoma of the breast: a
pitfall of aspiration cytology.
Cytopathol-
ogy
2006;17:239-244.
90.
Saad RS, Kanbour-Shakir A, Syed A, et
al. Sclerosing papillary lesion of the
breast: a diagnostic pitfall for malig-
nancy in fine needle aspiration biopsy.
Diagn Cytopathol
2006;34:114-118.
91.
Hermansen C, Poulsen HS, Jensen J, et al.
Diagnostic reliability of combined physi-
cal examination, mammography, and fine-
needle puncture ("triple-test") in breast
tumors.
Cancer
1987;60:1866-1871.
92.
Negri S, Bonetti F, Capitanio A, et al.
Preoperative diagnostic accuracy of fine-
needle aspiration in the management of
breast lesions: comparison of specificity
and sensitivity with clinical examina-
tion, mammography, echography, and
thermography in 249 patients.
Diagn
Cytopathol
1994;11:4-8.
93.
Donegan WL. Evaluation of a
palpable breast mass.
N Engl J Med
1992;327:937-942.
94.
Ljung BM, Drejet A, Chiampi N, et
al. Diagnostic accuracy of fine nee-
dle aspiration biopsy is determined
by physician training in sampling
technique.
Cancer (Cancer Cytopathol)
2001;93:263-268.
95.
Coghill SB, Brown L. Why pathologists
should take needle aspiration speci-
mens.
Cytopathology
1995;6:1-4.
96.
Mair S, Dunbar F, Becker PJ, et al. Fine
needle cytology—is aspiration suction
necessary? A study of 100 masses in vari-
ous sites.
Acta Cytol
1989;33:809-813.
97.
Rajasekhar A, Sundaram C, Chowd-
hary T, et al. Diagnostic utility of fine
needle sampling without aspiration—a
prospective study.
Diagn Cytopathol
1991;7:473-476.
98.
Silverman JF, Frable WJ. The use of the
Diff-Quik stain in the immediate inter-
pretation of fine-needle aspiration biop-
sies.
Diagn Cytopathol
1990;6:366-369.
99.
Istvanic S, Fischer AH, Banner BF, et al.
Cell blocks of breast FNAs frequently
allow diagnosis of invasion or histologi-
cal classification of proliferative changes.
Diagn Cytopathol
2007;35:263-269.
100.
Bedard YC, Pollett AE, Breast FNA. A
comparison of ThinPrep and conventional
smears.
Am J Clin Pathol
1999;111:523-527.
764
previous page 755 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online next page 757 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online Home Toggle text on/off