PART TWO
Diagnostic Cytology
73. Renshaw AA, Schwartz MR, Wang E, et al.
Cytologic features of adenocarcinoma,
not otherwise specified, in conven-
tional smears: comparison of cases that
performed poorly with those that per-
formed well in the College of American
Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison
Program in Cervicovaginal Cytology.
Arch
Pathol Lab Med
2006;130(1):23-26.
74. Austin RM, Ramzy I. Increased detection
of epithelial cell abnormalities by liquid-
based gynecologic cytology preparations.
A review of accumulated data.
Acta Cytol
1998;42(1):178-184.
75. Ashfaq R, Gibbons D, Vela C, et al.
ThinPrep Pap test. Accuracy for
glandular disease.
Acta Cytol
79.
1999;43(1):81-85.
DeSimone CP, Day ME, Tovar MM, et al.
Rate of pathology from glandular
cells classified by the Bethesda system
80.
2001 nomenclature.
Obstet Gynecol
2006;107:1285-1291.
Chhieng DC, Gallaspy S, Yang H, et al.
Women with atypical glandular cells:
81.
a long term follow-up study in a high
risk population.
Am J Clin Pathol
2004;122:575-579.
Arian S, Walts AE, Thomas P, et al.
The anal Pap smear: cytomorphology
of squamous intraepithelial lesions.
Cytojournal
2006;2-4.
76.
77.
78.
Nayar R, Contreras N, Luzadeer R, et al.
Screening for anal cancer: cytologic
findings and follow-up.
Cancer
Cytopathol
2006;108:423 (abstract).
Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D,
et al. American Cancer Guideline for the
early detection of cervical neoplasia and
cancer.
CA Cancer J Clin
2002;52:342.
Solomon D, Breen N, McNeel T. Cervical
cancer screening rates in the United States
and the potential impact of implementa-
tion of screening guidelines.
CA Cancer J
Clin
2007;57:105-111.
90
previous page 92 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online next page 94 ComprehensiveCytopathology 1104p 2008 read online Home Toggle text on/off